niedziela, 9 marca 2014

Google Hammers Polish Link Networks

Google is continuing their attack on international spam, with Matt Cutts announcing they had taken down two Polish link networks.

There is some speculation about which two link networks have been taken down, however it will be a couple days before we know for certain which ones were penalized unless networks themselves comment on it.

Buying and selling links seems to be quite common in Poland, so we could see some dramatic changes in Google's Polish search results in the coming days.

Google also added a reminder blog post to the Polish Google blog, alerting webmasters about unnatural linking and how to do a reconsideration request. This is similar to what they did for French webmasters, when they posted a reminder about buying and selling links in the French webmaster help forums.

After Google was active in taking down English language link networks late last year and the beginning of this year, Google now seems to have focused on international link networks. While Cutts specifically says they aren't done with Germany yet, they penalized one German link network earlier this month shortly after they took down the French network Buzzea.

Affected Polish webmasters, or those who suspect they are possibly caught in it, should check their Google Webmaster Tools accounts for the next week or two, depending on how long it takes the penalty to appear. However, you can be proactive and remove any links you believe will be impacted off of your own sites, and request webmasters to remove links that point to your site.

With Google being really focused on the problems surrounding link networks, we should definitely expect more to be taken down, both English-language and international.



View the Original article

sobota, 8 marca 2014

New BloomReach Tool SNAP Personalizes Site Search, Navigation for Shoppers

by Jessica Lee,February 25, 2014 Comments

Making the web experience unique to your audience is something marketers strive for. That’s why real-time personalization technology and methods are gaining ground.

Big data app company BloomReach today attempted to make the shopping experience more personal with its announcement of SNAP – technology that adapts a site’s search, navigation, and content to each visitor.

With SNAP, ecommerce sites can boost or bury products with a couple clicks, control autosuggest search results and more. SNAP builds on the company’s web relevance engine (its "smart" machine that understands intent and delivers custom results within a site). We’ve reported on BloomReach’s customized experience cross-device before. 

But one of the new features SNAP brings to the table is giving ecommerce sites more control over the user experience without the old cumbersome ways of deploying, said BloomReach.

From its site:

Old methods of defining customers no longer work. If site experience – search, navigation and personalization – relies on tagging, rules and a collection of disjointed widgets, businesses miss opportunity at best and possibly damage their brands.BloomReach SNAP understands your customers’ behaviors, web content, and your content and brings that data together to give each and every consumer a personalized experience that matches their behavior, taste and intent. When customers know that you understand them, they are happier, spend more, and return more often.

The BloomReach SNAP functionality allows ecommerce brands to control rankings of products within the site with a few clicks. On the back-end of the dashboard, marketers and merchants can search for a specific product, for example, “front-load washers”, and view the site’s inventory and each washer's key performance metrics.

Based on that data, marketers can decide to either boost or bury a product in the user's search results for “front load washers”. The products chosen to be boosted will be presented as the first options in the results for that query.

An additional way merchants can personalize the shopping experience in SNAP is through its autosuggest control. Through BloomReach technology, the autosuggest feature builds on its predictive search results, which offer a “deep understanding of your products and web wide demand to make sure your customers see the right product mix for their search.”

Here’s a screenshot of autosuggest in action for the retailer, Deb Shops, which would be using the predictive search technology:



View the Original article

Matt Cutts: EXIF Image Metadata is 'Potentially' a Google Search Ranking Factor

EXIF data is the metadata that is included in most images that are taken with the camera. It includes things such as camera type, date taken, size, along with dozens of other parameters.

But does any of this metadata have any impact on Google search results? Could webmasters potentially manipulate this information in order to rank better either in the regular search results or image search?

In the latest Google webmaster help video, Google's Distinguished Engineer Matt Cutts discusses whether EXIF data from pictures is a ranking factor in search results. The answer might surprise you, and will get many more webmasters looking into EXIF data and how they should be utilizing it within their images.

"The short answer is we did a blog post in April 2012 where we talked about it and we did say we reserve the right to use EXIF or other sort of meta data that we find an image in order to help people find information," Cutts said. "And at least in the version of image search as it existed back then, when you clicked on an image we would sometimes show the information from EXIF data in the right-hand sidebar. So it is something that Google is able to parse out and I think we do reserve the right to use it in ranking."

There are many other sites that will show EXIF data, the most common being Flickr, which has the option available to all photographers uploading images to include that information, which is then accessed via a click in the sidebar of the image.

"So if you're taking pictures, I would go ahead and embed that sort of information if it's available within your camera, because if somebody wants to eventually search for camera types or focal lengths or dates or something like that, it could possibly be a useful source of information," Cutts said. "So go ahead and include it if it's already there, I wouldn't worry about adding it if it's not there. But we do reserve the right to use it as potentially a ranking factor."

It's interesting that Cutts repeatedly says Google reserves the right to potentially use EXIF as a ranking factor in the future. So many should view this as a potential heads up that Google is leaning towards using this information in some fashion fairly soon, and I might want to think about incorporating information when taking new images.

What is in EXIF data that could potentially be used for ranking factor? The obvious would be the geotagging data that is included with the built-in GPS, such as when the photo was taken with a mobile phone. This could be done to help ensure specific photos were taken at a particular business in question, such as for local results. However, this data can be manipulated and changed or added after the fact.

However, there are also "Image Description", "keywords" and "subject" metadata tags that most people don't realize is there. And while people have definitely tried testing stuffing keywords in these fields, there's no evidence that Google is using this at all. It is pretty similar to how Google now pretty much ignores anything that's in the keyword meta-tag on webpages, because of its high susceptibility to be spammed.

There are also fields to put copyright information and photographer information, including contact information. This could definitely be useful for Google when they are trying to determine who the originator of a particular image is.

Considering how frequently images tend to get ripped off from the web, there's always the possibility that Google could attribute the original image to the wrong webpage or site. With photographer information, it could be used by Google to properly attribute the original image.

Bottom line, this video makes me suspect that Google will be making a move to incorporate more data from EXIF into their search results, particularly the image search results, provided they can ensure that the data they use isn't spammable by webmasters. So brush up on your EXIF data, and if you are taking photos, ensure that EXIF data is being properly embedded.



View the Original article

7 Things You May Not Know About Google's Disavow Tool

Are you completely obsessed with understanding and getting the most benefit out of the Google Disavow Links Tool?

This tool has been a mystery to many since it was announced in October 2012, and several misconceptions surround its use.

Here are seven facts that you may not know about the disavow tool.

1. Disavowed Links are Still Seen in Webmaster Tools

I will commonly see people asking in forums why the disavow tool isn't working for them. "I disavowed thousands of links, but I still see them in my Webmaster Tools backlinks!"

When a link is disavowed, the next time that Google crawls that link they essentially add an invisible nofollow tag to the link. There is no external evidence of this. Just as your nofollowed links are listed in WMT, so are your disavowed links.

In this webmaster central hangout Google's John Mueller said, "Disavowed links stay in Webmaster Tools" and in this hangout he said, "When you disavow links we will still show them as inbound links in Webmaster Tools."

2. There is a Size Limit to the Disavow File

The disavow file has a 2 megabyte size limit according to Google employee Aaseesh Marina. This is still quite large though.

Two megabytes of text is essentially the same 1,000 full pages of text. Even my largest disavow files have come nowhere near this size limit.

3. The Webspam Team Doesn't Read Comments in Your Disavow File

The official documentation for the disavow tool is a bit confusing when it comes to comments. They give the following example:



View the Original article

piątek, 7 marca 2014

3 Ways Merging Google AdWords & Analytics Can Improve PPC Results

Black Friday Readiness With Search in Mind: Is Your Business Ready?October 13, 2013Popular→ How to Find Keyword Conversions by URL Using Google Webmaster ToolsFebruary 21, 2014→ Google

View the Original article

8 UX Tools Every Digital Marketer Needs in Their Toolkit

by Erin Everhart,February 26, 2014 Comments

The convergence of digital marketing and user experience isn't coming; it's already here. You can't have successful website without both.

The following eight UX tools can't substitute having a UX specialist on staff, but they can help you immensely in better understanding how your actions affect a user's experience and how you can not only drive traffic, but increase conversions.

Research Tools



View the Original article

Bing Expands Timelines For a Half Million Famous People

by Thom Craver,February 26, 2014 Comments

Just a few weeks after Bing introduced the timeline feature for Olympic athletes, Bing has now expanded that to include other famous and/or influential people.



View the Original article

czwartek, 6 marca 2014

Google, Yandex Integrate Display Ad Platforms

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em? Google has teamed up with Russia's top search engine to help revolutionize display ads in the Russian market.

This morning, Yandex announced a partnership with Google for online display advertising sales.

In the deal, Google's demand-side ad platform, DoubleClick Bid Manager, will be connected to Yandex's real-time bidding system. At the same time, Yandex's demand-side platform, named AWAPS, will become part of the DoubleClick Ad Exchange, Google's real-time bidding marketplace.

Real-time bidding is a newer technology that allows buyers to bid and purchase ad space on an impression-by-impression basis. This partnership now allows both Google's and Yandex's real-time bidding systems integration, providing Google's advertising customers with access to Yandex's inventory and Yandex's ad customers access to the DoubleClick Ad Exchange.



View the Original article

Twitter Adds Promoted Accounts to Search Results

by Jennifer Slegg,February 26, 2014 Comments

Twitter is introducing a new feature sure to make advertisers happy. Twitter advertisers will now have the option to promote accounts in search results, the great new high exposure ad placement for advertisers looking to promote their Twitter accounts, rather than promoting a specific Tweet.

Here's an example Twitter provided in its announcement, showing a search for

View the Original article

Facebook News Feed Now Shows Content From Pages That Tag Pages You Follow

by Jennifer Slegg,February 26, 2014 Comments

If you follow or like a Page on Facebook, and another Page tags that page on Facebook within their own post, there's a higher likelihood that you'll see that post in your feed, even though you haven't liked or followed that brand or business.

Here's the example Facebook provided, in which Bleacher Report's Facebook Page tagged Dwight Howard's Facebook Page:



View the Original article

środa, 5 marca 2014

Google Powers 'American Idol' Voting, See Live Results in Facebook

Google Powers 'American Idol' Voting, See Live Results in Facebookby Jessica Lee,February 26, 2014 Comments

Are you an "American Idol" fan? Do you vote on your favorite performers? Then this little announcement from Google may just have you jumping for joy – especially since the 13th season finals kick off tonight on the show. Now, you can cast your vote directly from Google search results.

From Google's announcement: 

We’ve partnered with FOX to serve as an official voting platform for Idol and you can vote for Idol finalists on Google from your phone, tablet, or desktop.

If you search for "American Idol" during the voting portion of the show (if you try it now, nothing will happen), Google serves up "American Idol" contestants at the top of the results, like so:



View the Original article

Yandex & Google: A Big Change for Russia's Display Ad Market

Yandex & Google: A Big Change for Russia's Display Ad Marketby Michael Bonfils,February 27, 2014 Comments

One of the fastest growing trends currently in digital marketing is real-time bidding. Today, we are finding it much more effective than classic display media buying due to the fact that the conversion rate can reach more than 10 percent and the specific targeting capabilities are similar to what we find with paid search.

Every year the average growth of the real-time bidding market is hitting between 50 and 80 percent, according to eMarketer:



View the Original article

Responsive Design vs. Task-Oriented UX Design

Responsive design is all the rage these days, but most folks don't really know what it means. Consequently, when they ask a design firm to build a responsive website, they end up with what they asked for, but not what they really need.

Responsive means that a single site design scales to fit reasonably well on a desktop, tablet, and phone. Which means that a site with lots of content becomes very hard to read on the smaller platform. Oftentimes, designers employ a Mobile-First design approach to design the site so that it looks and interacts well on the phone, and then scale the design up for the tablet and desktop.Task-Oriented provides a different version of a site for each of the three platforms. These different designs are optimized to address the different usage models of the three platforms and the needs of the users' tasks within each of those usage models.Consumption Tasks: Some sites focus solely on providing content for consumption, such as CNN, Wall Street Journal, etc. With these sites, there is little interaction beyond finding interesting content and responsive design may be sufficient.Interaction Tasks: Most other sites, though, require and depend on a richer, more complex interaction model. If your site requires more doing than reading, yours is an interaction task site, which can't be successfully served with a responsive design. 

You should consider the following usage models when determining the tasks you expect your users to perform on each of the different platforms.

Usage Models

For the most part, users tend to use each of the three platforms differently. While exceptions do occur, the following are some general usage paradigms.

Laptop/Desktop



View the Original article

wtorek, 4 marca 2014

Why SEO is About Pull, Not Push

by Guillaume Bouchard,February 27, 2014 Comments

The best advice for executing SEO in 2014 is to always be open to new ways of thinking about the industry. Over the past few years, SEO has been forced to evolve and segment into several distinct practices: content marketing, public relations, reputation management, technical consulting and so on.

While these segments are often divisive – geeks shunning community managers, web analysts dismissing copywriters – their presence forces both generalists and specialists alike to be more introspective, to question the services they offer, and to push the industry to evolve at an excitingly disruptive pace.

Recently I've been contemplating whether SEO should be considered a marketing service at all – and I've been meditating on the fact that it is undeniably closer to being a "feature" of web development, rather than a way of marketing a brand to an audience.

Thinking about SEO in this way unlocks a new approach to search optimization. It distances the SEO folks from other marketing channels and allows them to adopt a vocabulary that imitates developers and designers.

When we start thinking about SEO as a feature of a product, instead of a marketing service, it aligns efforts with innovative methodologies found elsewhere in digital: lean/agile development, responsive operating systems and user-centric design.

Though SEO is admittedly still – at its heart – a way of optimizing a marketing channel, I've always found it productive to think about our service offering through alternative or unconventional lenses.

How to Improve Upon the Product

Historically, search optimization comes as an afterthought for many businesses.

Once the site has been built, the SEO team is usually brought on to "push" the website out into search engines, and execute tactics in hopes of bringing more visibility and traffic to the website.



View the Original article

Amazon, Best Buy, Bank of America Top Mobile Search Advertisers in January

by Jessica Lee,February 27, 2014 Comments

Are you taking advantage of mobile advertising like Amazon, Best Buy, and Bank of America? AdGooroo this week highlighted the top advertisers in mobile search based on impressions for the top 50,000 keywords in U.S. Google AdWords.



View the Original article

Google AdWords Launches Flexible Conversion Counting

by Jennifer Slegg,February 27, 2014 Comments

Earlier this month we reported that Google AdWords was planning to change the way conversions are counted. Now it's official.

Google AdWords has officially announced a new way for advertisers to track and measure conversions with their new flexible conversion counting. The goal is to help advertisers track the types of conversions that work best for their business model.

The change to the "many per clicks" conversions means that an advertiser can track different conversion types on the same click.

For example, AdWords uses the example of the Berkeley Tees company, where they want to track both leads, which they determined by those who download catalog, as well as those that actually buy a T-shirt:

View the Original article

poniedziałek, 3 marca 2014

Matt Cutts: Submit Scraper Sites That Outrank You on Google

Scraper sites – those sites that copy content others have created and post it on their own site or blog as their own – have been the bane of webmasters for many, many years.

Even though, logically, the originating content should rank number one for the content since they are the originating source, often times you'll find scraper sites ranking above the content originator, usually in conjunction with other spam methods to get the content ranking.

Even worse, sometimes the original source of content vanishes from the search results while a scraper site's version continues to rank well

Google today has released a new Scraper Report form where webmasters can submit scraper sites that has copied their own content by providing Google with the source URL, where the content was taken from, and the URL of the scraper site where the content is being republished or repurposed, and the keywords where the scraper site was ranking on.

Google is also asking webmasters to confirm that their site follows the webmaster guidelines before submitting, although chances are pretty good that those webmasters who find the scraper report form are also aware of the Google webmaster guidelines and how to find penalties in their Google Webmaster accounts.

Does this mean that scraper sites are becoming more of a problem now than they have in the past? Not necessarily, however that could be part of the reason.

Sometimes scraper sites aren't necessarily ranking for the top money keywords, but there prevalent enough cluttering up the search results after the top 10 or so, and can be a lot more prevalent on long-tail search results as well as when you go beyond Page 1 or 2 of Google (it can be difficult to find non-scraped content for long-tail keywords on some searches). And the only way to get scraper content out of Google search results is by filing a DMCA.

Google isn't saying exactly what they're doing with this data. Is this being used as an easy way for webmasters to get the scraper sites out of the index without having to use the DMCA? Are they using it to improve their algorithms to try and determine where the originating content is versus the scraper content? Google doesn't say, although I suspect it is being used to improve the algorithm by seeing how and why scrapers are ranking.

This definitely has the mark of projects that one spam team member is working on. Back in August, Cutts also asked for examples of small websites that weren't ranking as well, despite being high quality, although that one specifically had a disclaimer saying that those submissions wouldn't affect the rankings.

It's great that Google is choosing to again look at scraper sites, because it has been pretty annoying for webmasters for so many years, even if they aren't necessarily ranking high.

This isn't the first time Google has asked for help with scrapers, and Google also tried to reduce the number of scrapers algorithmically in 2011.

Hopefully we will see a refresh on how scrapers are handled in a future update of Google's search algorithm.



View the Original article

Matt Cutts: Write Clear, Understandable Content

As webmasters, it's constantly drilled into us that quality content is key as part of an SEO strategy. But when it comes to more technical content, how should you handle it?

Should your content be geared toward a higher, more specialized reading level, or should it be written in such a way that novices on the topic can understand? This is the topic of the latest webmaster help video featuring Google's Matt Cutts.

Many webmasters are hyper analyzing their content lately to ensure that however they present the content and readiness is going to rank the best in Google. But how can you find this balance between super technical writing and writing aimed at the general public who might be interested in the topic but don't have knowledge behind it to understand the more complex discussion or vocabulary?

Cutts began by sharing what is likely a familiar scenario for many. You end up at Wikipedia trying to find background information on a topic, but it's either way too technical or simply not understandable.

"So you see this sort of revival of people who are interested in things like 'explain it to me like I'm a 5-year-old'," Cutts said. "You don't have to dumb it down that much. but if you're erring on the side of clarity, and on the side of something that's going to be understandable, you'll be in much better shape because regular people can get it, and then ... feel free to include the scientific terms or the industry jargon, the lingo, or whatever it is."

It seems Cutts believes you should strive to strike the right balance between technical writing while still ensuring that the average person can understand it.

"You need to find some way to pull people in, to get them interested, to get them enticed to try to pick up whatever concept it is you want to explain," Cutts said. "So I would argue, first and foremost, you need to explain it well, and then if you can manage to do that while talking about the science or being scientific, that's great."

Cutts said that how you explain a topic often matters almost as much as what you're actually saying.

"If you're saying something important but you can't get it across, then sometimes you never get across in the first place, and it ends up falling on deaf ears," he said.

What about if your target audience is a group of people that are industry professionals or have the same sites reference you? You don't necessarily want to alienate that audience because you dumb it down too much for the general public.

But on the other hand, you want your content to be approachable by the masses, because that opens you to a much wider audience than the smaller group of technical people you might currently target.

Sometimes it's about finding a balance or writing for two different audiences with different content for each.

"If you're only talking to industry professionals, exterminators were talking about the scientific names of bugs, and your audience is only exterminator experts, then that would make sense" Cutts said. "But in general I will try to make something is natural sounding as possible."

He also suggested a tried-and-true techniques that many people have used for years: reading your content aloud. Often you can pick up the little mistakes or the awkward sounding parts, such as excessive use of keywords, when you read it out loud.

"When I'm writing a blog post, I'll sometimes read it out loud to try to catch what the snags are, and where things are going to be unclear," Cutts said. "Anything you do like that you'll end up with more polished writing, and that's more likely to stand the test of time."

Bottom line, don't focus on being so technical that you're excluding a lot of the audience that might want to learn more about your topic, but just can't understand it because you're not explaining it well.



View the Original article

Content Marketing Put a Man on the Moon, What Can it Do For You?

by Lisa Buyer,February 28, 2014 Comments

Content marketing is all the rage today, but did you know the greatest marketing case study in human history actually occurred in the late 1960s and early 1970s?

It began with President John F. Kennedy standing before Congress in 1961 and made it a goal to put a man on the moon before the decade was over. The end result was the historic landing of Apollo 11.

"It's actually the greatest story never told (until now) about content as a marketing tool that helped to deliver humans to the moon," said David Meerman Scott, most notable for writing The New Rules of Marketing and PR and coining the term newsjacking. He has just released his latest book: "Marketing the Moon: The Selling of the Apollo Lunar Program".



View the Original article

niedziela, 2 marca 2014

Attention Small Business Owners: SEO Demands Your Involvement

SEO has changed dramatically in the last few years. With massive algorithmic changes from Google launching each season, it can be tough for small business owners to keep up.

Some small business owners are getting SEO fatigue, opting for marketing that is simpler to understand and less risky. Others refuse to believe the rules have really changed and use outdated SEO tactics on the cheap. This, unfortunately, can lead to catastrophic outcomes as Google continues to hammer link networks.

Does SEO By Itself Still Work?

While demand for SEO services remains healthy, those who integrate their marketing strategies are finding the best results. Thirty-eight percent of companies who say their SEO is "highly effective" have pulled SEO and social media together. But this isn't an easy task. And it's a far cry from the straightforward link building activities of years' past.

The integrated SEO strategy of 2014 requires a renewed emphasis on brand and audience. This does not mean that rankings are no longer important. However, it does imply that priorities need to shift to remain competitive in the current SEO landscape.

Inserting the Small Business Brand into SEO

It used to be possible to do SEO in isolation and never mention or inspect the brand. First with on-site tactics, then blog comments, and finally with widgets, infographics, and article marketing. While the purists will insist this wasn't true, many small businesses forced their way onto Page 1 of search engines with non-branded link building tactics. Most agree that this is no longer effective.

Today's top ranking sites have focused on audience optimization, the idea that the attraction of citations, social shares, and backlinks stems from an intimate understanding of what the audience is looking for. Content marketing is the activity that feeds an eager audience high-quality materials, which is why 93 percent of marketers plan to use content marketing in 2014.

A funny thing happens when small businesses produce high-quality content: They want to put their name on it. Once again, Google is ahead of the masses, understanding that branded mentions (even those that don't accompany a backlink) are a signal of legitimacy. This is perhaps why so many SEO professionals insist that press releases help rankings, despite some data to the contrary.

Be Responsive to the SEO Provider

Despite the need for greater brand and social integration, 50 percent of small business still prefer to outsource SEO. However, the nature and frequency of interactions with the vendor will be vastly different in 2014 than in previous years.

To successfully build stronger content marketing, SEO professionals will need more knowledge of the business and their audience, which requires client contact.

As the SEO firm pushes press release activities, the small business needs to provide newsworthy ideas and approve final copy in a timely fashion to maintain a consistent editorial calendar. Business owners need to accept that branded mentions without backlinks are a good thing. This may sound crazy, but some small business owners don't return phone calls from their SEO firm.

Conclusions

As much as small business owners may miss the simplistic link building days, all data indicates that SEO is now a much more complicated activity. While still strongly profitable, SEO in 2014 is integrated with social and PR in ways never before seen.

This has had a strong impact on the demands the SEO firm must place on the small business owner. And to remain successful in the rankings, small businesses must find the time to participate in the process (or at least return phone calls).



View the Original article